Sunday, August 25, 2013

Fan Fiction

                Most of everybody I know over the age of fourteen (and claim to have mastered the elements of fictional writing) say that “Fan fiction” is a load of potatoes. In other words, they think taking a piece of entertainment (a book/movie/show/etc) and molding it into a different shape and form so deeply that everything about this piece of entertainment (other than the characters and the main “magical” sense of the entertainment) is different, is absolutely disgusting. But they are wrong. See, fan fiction is really just a synonym for inspiration of a plot or theme. What these critics are really basing their opinions off of (whether they know it or not), are twelve year olds taking the entire theme, plot, and characters and rewriting it. That’s not the only type of fan fiction. Real fan fiction is taking the inner depths and the idea of the piece of entertainment and using it to create their own. The truth is, fan fiction is probably the most overrated yet misunderstood genre, and critics do not even acknowledge that.
                If people really want to get inside the depths of fan fiction, they need to look at literature as a whole. What inspired Suzanne Collins to write a book about a group of youths trying to kill each other over a simple reward? She said much of her novel was based upon Theseus, a tale in Greek Mythology. And do people think it is a coincidence that all science-fiction hold ties to Orson Scott Card and Ray Bradberry? If so, they need to reread books from the 20th century. Too many books have common themes taken from people like Shakespeare and Mary Shelley. If people can take characters from legends, change their names, possibly add a few quirks to their main conflicts, is that not the same thing as fan fiction? I have read way too many books lately about an abused main character that “suddenly” realized that they are just a magical creature born in the wrong world. Surely that idea originated from somewhere. And what about when authors name their characters off of different characters? Like Hermione from “The Winter’s Tale” (Shakespeare). Most people do not even know that connection because “The Winter’s Tale” is overshadowed by other works of Shakespeare like “Romeo & Juliet” and “Julius Caesar”. Maybe if they did, they would realize that even the most powerful writers of this generation are basing their “oh so original” works on classics that people have forgotten about.
                Fan fiction is not necessarily bad. Whether it is published, unpublished, hidden inside other famous works, tucked into the cracks of overrated internet sites, it is just a genre that has been picked on and abused. If we did not have fan fiction, a lot of the works that make up our life today would be gone. If anything, fan fiction is needed. Even a critic in The New York Times can manage to defend the classical, new age fan fiction written by twelve year olds on sketchy websites:
“Fan fiction is what literature might look like if it were reinvented from scratch after a nuclear apocalypse by a band of brilliant pop-culture junkies trapped in a sealed bunker. They don’t do it for money. That’s not what it’s about. The writers write it and put it up online just for the satisfaction. They’re fans, but they’re not silent, couchbound consumers of media. The culture talks to them, and they talk back to the culture in its own language.”
— 




                So yeah, maybe fan fiction can be collection of paragraphs consisting of trash that are practically insults toward the original works, but in the end everything is a piece of fan fiction. We all want to base our pieces off works from people like Oscar Wilde, Homer, and Charlotte Bronte; not because we are not creative enough to write as well as them, but because we see them as the true masters of fiction. And who knows, maybe we are not reading about Sherlock Holmes dealing with his secret crush on John Watson three hundred years earlier than the true story is set, but two men fighting the social prejudices in the Elizabethan Era while at the same time being forced under a injustice monarchy to save the English community so that their nation will not collapse. 

1 comment:

  1. I agree with you thoroughly. I also believe that fan fiction is greatly misunderstood. Sure people have their own preferences, but I don't think people should discredit the *entirety* of the genre simply because of a few twelve-year-olds.

    Fan fiction is a *wonderful* genre because it allows fans of works to interact. If someone likes a certain book, they are able to interact with the text and other fans of the book. Fan fiction also allows people--whether they are fans of the work or not--to view different perspectives taken from the work. If I liked a story, but thought a relationship between the protagonist and a minor character was seriously underrated, I can create my own story where the relationship between the two is strengthened. Maybe others of similar thinking will agree with me. Maybe others who did not consider it before will begin to think about it. Maybe people who never liked that minor character will begin to rethink themselves. And maybe no one will read it at all, but I am provided with my own wonderful source of catharsis.

    The beauty of fan fiction is that an author's work never truly ends, which is especially exciting for fans of that author's work. A story can be altered or shifted to provide a different take on it, not for the gain for the person who wrote the fan fiction, but for the good of the story around which an entire community revolves. All works of fan fiction are not trashy, error-laden, and poorly-developed stories written by ignorant children--great discussions can be achieved because of fan fiction, just as they can be with the original works. And you're right again, Aspen: even some of the original works are works of fan fiction themselves.

    ReplyDelete